football.jpg

 

NCAA FOOTBALL LIVE ODDS NFL FOOTBALL GAMBLING BONUS COLLEGE FOOTBALL INFO

“The old ball coach,” Steve Spurrier has really shown he can coach a college football team. After successful years at the University of Florida, followed by not so successful years as the Washington Redskins coach, he has his South Carolina Gamecocks undefeated and ready to roar against the LSU Tigers. However, the LSU squad is playing incredibly inspired football, allowing only one touchdown in three games and averaging about 46 points per game, including over 40 points in all of their outings. Their “toughest” challenge of the year so far was when Virginia Tech came to town. By the end of the first half LSU had a 24-0 game, and for all intents and purposes the game was over. The Tigers have followed up that performance with a 44-0 performance, led by first time starting quarterback Ryan Perrilloux (304 yards passing and three touchdowns.)

South Carolina’s most impressive win came two weeks ago at Georgia in a 16-12 victory. The Gamecocks were slight underdogs in this game, but as you can imagine they will be huge underdogs in this one. The current line has LSU as 16.5 point favorites. South Carolina will need to play better offense if they even hope to have a prayer against the number two rated team in the country. They did put up 38 points last week, but that was against unheralded South Carolina State. Quarterback Blake Mitchell has been steady, but hasn’t been overpowering throwing for 321 yards and three touchdowns in the early season. South Carolina is a hard team to get a grasp on, because one week they look average and the next week they are beating Georgia at Georgia.

My guess here is that the speed, power, and overall better talent at key positions with put LSU over in this one. If the Gamecocks defense can find away to slow down the rushing tandem of Jacob Hester and Keiland Williams they might have a shot, but with LSU playing at home, on top of the other things mentioned, I like LSU to win this one by 20 points, at least.